Chris Beverley's Blog
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors." - Plato
Friday, 17 May 2013
Thursday, 16 May 2013
Sunday, 12 May 2013
Saturday, 11 May 2013
Friday, 10 May 2013
Thursday, 9 May 2013
Last week's election results - some reasons to feel good
![]() |
| To avoid losing each other, UKIP counting agents now wear hi-vis jackets to election counts |
With this in mind, I would like to explain why I think that
last week's election results are not all bad and why they should give us hope
for the future. And before anyone misinterprets anything I will write in the
next few paragraphs, let me make it clear at the outset that I am not
suggesting for one second that anyone reading this should ever vote for UKIP. I
have never voted for UKIP myself. I would vote for Labour before I voted for UKIP
(and you know I would never do that!)
If you go down to the polling station and
discover that there is 'only' UKIP to vote for then you might want to spoil
your ballot by writing on it words to the effect that 'I am so sorry for not
standing as an English Democrats candidate in this election but I promise to do
so next time to give local people the chance to vote for a party that cares
about England'.
I hope my stance on voting UKIP is clear enough?
So with that caveat out of the way, here are 3 reasons to be
positive about last week's results:
1) The increase in support for this aspiring 'fourth party'
in British politics has the potential to further destabilise the post-war electoral
routine consisting of the spectacle of Labour or the Tories running the country
for a term or two, then being replaced by the other one. Two or three terms
later we are back with the first one, and the cycle continues indefinitely (I
will leave aside discussion of the 2010 coalition for now). It doesn't matter
how much damage the Tories or Labour do to our country during their time in
office, the only 'punishment' they receive from the electorate is having to sit
in opposition for a term or two before they are enthusiastically voted back
into power.
Clearly, for politically-minded people, such a routine is
farcical and anything which serves to erode the stranglehold of the main three parties
upon our nation and prompts people to actually think about whom to vote for
rather than simply voting for a party because it has been out of office for a
while or because it is now in power so the 'done thing' is to vote for the 'other'
party in the local elections is to be welcomed. The success achieved by the
Greens last week might be viewed as another small nudge in this direction.
2) Although UKIP undoubtedly has a number of rather
unpleasant members, it is equally clear that many of them, which is likely to
include some members who were elected as councillors last week, will be thoroughly
decent individuals who are just trying to do their best for their country and
simply find themselves in what we regard as the wrong party. The bigger UKIP
gets in terms of members and elected councillors, the greater chance there is
that the English Democrats will benefit indirectly by winning over some of
their members once they realise that, whilst UKIP might appear to share some of
our policy goals, when it comes to looking after the interests of England (as
opposed to maintaining the Union) UKIP have nothing of interest to offer
whatsoever.
There is a perceived overlap between the English Democrats
and UKIP and we are viewed by the electorate in a similar light. This means
that members and voters often feel quite comfortable switching between our two
parties. Clearly this poses a danger for us in that if UKIP are performing
better than us at any given time then we might haemorrhage support to UKIP. But
on the other hand, by increasing the size of their organisation and by making
gains in the local elections on a scale which no nationalist organisation has
ever managed in this country, UKIP have increased the size of the pond in which
we English nationalists swim.
As long as we build on the progress we have made in the last couple of years and improve our game across the board then we have the potential to gain valuable recruits from this increased pool of politically-active patriots which UKIP has helped to create.
One thing we have in our favour which UKIP will find hard to
hijack is the fact that unlike them, we are a party which speaks up loud and
clear for England. For people who care as much or more about this than, say,
getting the UK out of the European Union, we are therefore a more attractive
choice than UKIP, or, at least, we will be once we have sufficiently upped our
game politically.
3) Linked in with the above point, we need to acknowledge
that to the vast majority of people in England, the English electorate has
just taken a significant 'right turn' politically (I don't like using the
outdated left-wing/right-wing dichotomy but I do so here as this is how UKIP
are often portrayed in the media) and voted for a party which is associated,
rightly or wrongly, with opposing mass immigration, getting Britain out of the
EU, and opposing the political correctness of the Lib-Lab-Con cartel. Whilst we might disapprove of UKIP as a party,
we must surely take heart from the fact that a significant proportion of the
electorate have voted in this way.
Let's imagine for a moment that UKIP did appallingly last
Thursday (hooray!) and the big victors were not the English Democrats or any
other nationalist organisation but instead were a party of the extreme left. We
do not have to invent such a party for the purposes of this thought-experiment:
let us imagine that the big victors last week were Respect. Imagine that they had campaigned hard on a pro-mass immigration theme and that this
had struck a chord with the English electorate, who subsequently voted for
Respect in large numbers.
It might be a thoroughly Schadenfreude-inducing experience
for some nationalists to see rival patriotic parties take a beating but would
this really be a better outcome than what actually transpired last week? What
sort of future would such an outcome promise for our children and their
children?
The fact that large numbers of people went out and voted for
what a recent IPPR poll revealed
was regarded as a patriotic pro-English party underlines the fact that there is
great potential for our party.
The only question is whether we improve our game and realise
that potential, or whether we sit back and let UKIP take advantage
of it instead. What last week's results show is that there is everything to
play for and potentially very significant progress to be made if we choose to
put in the hard work and make it happen. I for one intend to do everything in
my power to ensure that we do just that.
See also:
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

